NEW DELHI: PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti may have slammed Jammu and Kashmir CM Omar Abdullah over his call for reviving the Tulbul Navigation Project , but he has echoed India’s long-term interests, with experts flagging how its implementation will yield socio-economic benefits for the entire UT.
The project, also known as the Wular Barrage , is a navigation lock-cum-control structure located at the outlet of the country’s largest freshwater lake, Wular, in J&K. It was designed to facilitate navigation on the Jhelum river during lean winter months (Oct-Feb) but was stalled by Pakistan citing the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT).
As the treaty is in abeyance following the last month Pahalgam terror attack, experts, who have tracked the project’s development ever since it was stalled by Pakistan in 1987, believe that its implementation can be the most immediate step for the benefit of J&K.
“It is time for India to finally break ground on the long-stalled Tulbul Navigation Project,” said Uttam Sinha, a senior fellow at the Manohar Parrikar Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses. He rues that for nearly four decades, the “developmental aspirations” of the people of Kashmir were “sacrificed at the altar of diplomatic caution” even as its implementation falls well within the treaty.
“It is a matter of interpretation. India has long held the view that regulating depletion of naturally stored water for use of navigation, which is non-consumptive, is permissible under the IWT,” said Sinha.
Kushvinder Vohra, former Central Water Commission chairperson, echoed similar views and explained how the project will help in better flood and water management through the Wular lake, and also help in tackling drainage congestion downstream.
“It shall help in maintaining requisite water depth in the Jhelum below the Wular lake during the lean period so that navigation can be maintained throughout the year,” said Vohra, noting that it will also have an “incidental benefit” of increase in power production through hydro-electric projects .
But why was the project stalled when it falls well within the treaty? After all, non-consumptive use is permitted to India under the IWT which includes control or use of water for navigation, provided these do not prejudice downstream uses of waters by Pakistan. Islamabad could never establish any prejudice to their downstream uses by the construction of the structure.
Pakistan during multiple secretary-level talks in the past flagged that the project structure is a barrage with a storage capacity of around 0.3 million acre feet (0.369 billion cubic metre) and that India is not permitted to construct any storage facility on the main stem of the Jhelum river.
Sinha said, “It’s a matter of interpretation...Now, the suspension (of the IWT) paves the way for a more assertive water strategy...Implementation of the Tulbul project is the most immediate step that can be taken.”
The project, also known as the Wular Barrage , is a navigation lock-cum-control structure located at the outlet of the country’s largest freshwater lake, Wular, in J&K. It was designed to facilitate navigation on the Jhelum river during lean winter months (Oct-Feb) but was stalled by Pakistan citing the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT).
As the treaty is in abeyance following the last month Pahalgam terror attack, experts, who have tracked the project’s development ever since it was stalled by Pakistan in 1987, believe that its implementation can be the most immediate step for the benefit of J&K.
“It is time for India to finally break ground on the long-stalled Tulbul Navigation Project,” said Uttam Sinha, a senior fellow at the Manohar Parrikar Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses. He rues that for nearly four decades, the “developmental aspirations” of the people of Kashmir were “sacrificed at the altar of diplomatic caution” even as its implementation falls well within the treaty.
“It is a matter of interpretation. India has long held the view that regulating depletion of naturally stored water for use of navigation, which is non-consumptive, is permissible under the IWT,” said Sinha.
Kushvinder Vohra, former Central Water Commission chairperson, echoed similar views and explained how the project will help in better flood and water management through the Wular lake, and also help in tackling drainage congestion downstream.
“It shall help in maintaining requisite water depth in the Jhelum below the Wular lake during the lean period so that navigation can be maintained throughout the year,” said Vohra, noting that it will also have an “incidental benefit” of increase in power production through hydro-electric projects .
But why was the project stalled when it falls well within the treaty? After all, non-consumptive use is permitted to India under the IWT which includes control or use of water for navigation, provided these do not prejudice downstream uses of waters by Pakistan. Islamabad could never establish any prejudice to their downstream uses by the construction of the structure.
Pakistan during multiple secretary-level talks in the past flagged that the project structure is a barrage with a storage capacity of around 0.3 million acre feet (0.369 billion cubic metre) and that India is not permitted to construct any storage facility on the main stem of the Jhelum river.
Sinha said, “It’s a matter of interpretation...Now, the suspension (of the IWT) paves the way for a more assertive water strategy...Implementation of the Tulbul project is the most immediate step that can be taken.”
You may also like
Michael J Fox to make huge TV comeback in first role after devastating health battle
King Charles's heartbreaking plea to Prince William over 'mistake' in royal first
Arsenal set for huge £175m Viktor Gyokeres transfer boost as Andrea Berta handed summer war chest
Gogglebox star Pete Sandiford's 'real age' leaves fans stunned as they say he 'looks 18'
Emmerdale's Mack framed as sad death teased - but John's downfall 'sealed'
