Donald Trump’s use of the nickname “Pocahontas” to refer Senator Elizabeth Warren isn’t new, but it’s making headlines again. On May 28, 2025, President Trump’s advisor David Sacks reignited the controversy by claiming Warren controlled former President Joe Biden’s autopen, suggesting she had significant influence in his administration. The remark, widely seen as another swipe at Warren’s past claims of Native American ancestry , revives a political feud that began during her 2012 Senate run. With fresh attention on this issue, it’s worth examining how this nickname began, why it struck a nerve, and what it reveals about political discourse today.
The beginning of the “Pocahontas” controversy
The controversy centers around Warren’s long-standing claim of partial Native American ancestry. During her tenure at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard Law School in the 1980s and 1990s, Warren identified as Native American in a national faculty directory. Critics questioned whether this influenced her hiring, though both universities publicly denied that her heritage played any role.
Warren has always defended her identification, saying it was based on family stories passed down by her parents and grandparents. “This is our lives,” she told NPR in 2012. “And I’m very proud of it.”
Why Donald Trump gave this nickname to Elizabeth
President Trump began calling Warren “ Pocahontas ” during his 2016 campaign, a name meant to mock her ancestry claims and portray her as dishonest. The reference is to the real historical figure Pocahontas, a Powhatan woman involved in early colonial history. Trump’s use of her name in this context has been widely criticized as racially insensitive and disrespectful.
He once mocked Warren by pointing to her mention of high cheekbones as evidence of Native ancestry. Trump even publicly challenged her to take a DNA test, promising to donate $1 million to a charity of her choice if the results confirmed her claim.
Who was Pocahontas, really?
Pocahontas, born Amonute and also known as Matoaka, was the daughter of Chief Powhatan and a prominent figure in early American colonial history. Her life has been romanticized, especially through her association with English settler John Rolfe and her portrayal in films like Disney’s Pocahontas.
Many Native Americans argue that her story has been distorted to erase the violence of colonization. Using her name in a political insult, they say, reduces a significant cultural and historical figure to a tool for mockery. In 2018, Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin Jr. condemned the use of the nickname, calling it disrespectful and inappropriate.
The DNA test and Trump’s response
In 2018, Warren took Trump up on his challenge and released DNA test results. The report showed strong evidence of a Native American ancestor 6 to 10 generations ago. She asked Trump to follow through on his $1 million promise and suggested he donate to the National Indigenous Women’s Resource Center.
Trump dismissed the test, mocked the percentage of Native ancestry as insignificant, and later claimed that his pledge only applied if Warren became the Democratic nominee and debated him directly. He refused to make the donation, calling the entire situation a “scam and a lie.”
Resurgence of the Autopen allegation
The nickname resurfaced this week after David Sacks, now a White House advisor and President Trump’s Crypto and AI Czar, accused Warren of wielding power during the Biden presidency by controlling the use of his autopen. The claim, posted on X, was picked up by Trends Newsline and further amplified by some accounts
There is no concrete evidence supporting the accusation, and it appears to be another politically motivated attempt to cast doubt on Warren’s integrity and influence. Still, it brought the "Pocahontas" nickname back into the spotlight.
President Trump’s use of “Pocahontas” as a nickname for Elizabeth Warren may seem like a simple jab, but it reflects much deeper issues about how heritage, identity, and race are used in American politics. While Warren’s claims of ancestry have been debated for years, Trump’s repeated mockery and the nickname’s recent revival show how political figures can weaponize cultural identity.
Ultimately, this controversy continues to distract from more important conversations. Native communities have long asked for attention to real issues affecting them, not political name-calling. It’s time to shift the focus toward meaningful change and respect for Indigenous voices.
The Fake Pocahontas was using the Autopen!
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) May 28, 2025
“Elizabeth Warren controlled the Autopen…” -David Sachs
This is a coup against the American voter! pic.twitter.com/ZrWQJZREqA
The beginning of the “Pocahontas” controversy
The controversy centers around Warren’s long-standing claim of partial Native American ancestry. During her tenure at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard Law School in the 1980s and 1990s, Warren identified as Native American in a national faculty directory. Critics questioned whether this influenced her hiring, though both universities publicly denied that her heritage played any role.
Warren has always defended her identification, saying it was based on family stories passed down by her parents and grandparents. “This is our lives,” she told NPR in 2012. “And I’m very proud of it.”
Why Donald Trump gave this nickname to Elizabeth
President Trump began calling Warren “ Pocahontas ” during his 2016 campaign, a name meant to mock her ancestry claims and portray her as dishonest. The reference is to the real historical figure Pocahontas, a Powhatan woman involved in early colonial history. Trump’s use of her name in this context has been widely criticized as racially insensitive and disrespectful.
He once mocked Warren by pointing to her mention of high cheekbones as evidence of Native ancestry. Trump even publicly challenged her to take a DNA test, promising to donate $1 million to a charity of her choice if the results confirmed her claim.
Who was Pocahontas, really?
Pocahontas, born Amonute and also known as Matoaka, was the daughter of Chief Powhatan and a prominent figure in early American colonial history. Her life has been romanticized, especially through her association with English settler John Rolfe and her portrayal in films like Disney’s Pocahontas.
Many Native Americans argue that her story has been distorted to erase the violence of colonization. Using her name in a political insult, they say, reduces a significant cultural and historical figure to a tool for mockery. In 2018, Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin Jr. condemned the use of the nickname, calling it disrespectful and inappropriate.
The DNA test and Trump’s response
In 2018, Warren took Trump up on his challenge and released DNA test results. The report showed strong evidence of a Native American ancestor 6 to 10 generations ago. She asked Trump to follow through on his $1 million promise and suggested he donate to the National Indigenous Women’s Resource Center.
Trump dismissed the test, mocked the percentage of Native ancestry as insignificant, and later claimed that his pledge only applied if Warren became the Democratic nominee and debated him directly. He refused to make the donation, calling the entire situation a “scam and a lie.”
Resurgence of the Autopen allegation
The nickname resurfaced this week after David Sacks, now a White House advisor and President Trump’s Crypto and AI Czar, accused Warren of wielding power during the Biden presidency by controlling the use of his autopen. The claim, posted on X, was picked up by Trends Newsline and further amplified by some accounts
There is no concrete evidence supporting the accusation, and it appears to be another politically motivated attempt to cast doubt on Warren’s integrity and influence. Still, it brought the "Pocahontas" nickname back into the spotlight.
President Trump’s use of “Pocahontas” as a nickname for Elizabeth Warren may seem like a simple jab, but it reflects much deeper issues about how heritage, identity, and race are used in American politics. While Warren’s claims of ancestry have been debated for years, Trump’s repeated mockery and the nickname’s recent revival show how political figures can weaponize cultural identity.
Ultimately, this controversy continues to distract from more important conversations. Native communities have long asked for attention to real issues affecting them, not political name-calling. It’s time to shift the focus toward meaningful change and respect for Indigenous voices.
You may also like
Darwin Nunez becomes fifth Liverpool star to drop exit hint – but one insists he's staying
Next shoppers 'delighted' with 'beautiful' £45 lamp ideal for corners with no plug socket
'The missile you mentioned ... ': Chinese military dodges questions on performance of its weapons used by Pakistan against India
Halloumi and chickpea traybake is the 'ultimate budget hero' recipe to cook in 30 minutes
Netflix viewers 'can't stop crying' at 'phenomenal' series based on a tragic true story
